Melania Trump’s Shocking Reaction to Stormy Daniels’ Vogue Feature Uncovered in Explosive New Tapes

If you purchase an independently reviewed product or service through a link on our website, we may receive an affiliate commission.

Stephanie Winston Wolkoff, once a trusted confidante and the closest friend to Melania Trump, has sensationally released a previously unheard recording that captures the then-First Lady’s stunned reaction to news of Stormy Daniels appearing in Vogue. The adult film actress, who allegedly had an affair with Melania’s husband, Donald Trump, found herself featured in the prestigious fashion magazine, a development that clearly caught Melania off guard. In the secretly recorded conversation from July 2018, Winston Wolkoff, author of the revealing memoir Melania and Me, captured the First Lady’s disbelief. “It’s the porn hooker. Annie Leibovitz shot the porn hooker, and she’ll be in one of the issues,” Melania Trump can be heard saying in the tape, a clear indication of her shock and dismissive view of Daniels. This exclusive clip, shared with HollywoodLife, provides an unprecedented glimpse into the private thoughts of the First Lady during a period of intense public scrutiny, unveiling the raw emotions behind the polished public persona.

The conversation began with Winston Wolkoff expressing confusion when Melania mentioned the photographer. “Who did Leibovitz shoot?” she innocently asked, referring to Annie Leibovitz, one of the world’s most renowned and influential portrait photographers, whose iconic work has graced countless magazine covers and shaped cultural perceptions. Trump promptly clarified, “Stormy.” The First Lady then elaborated, emphasizing her surprise: “Oh, you didn’t read it? Yesterday [it] came up. For Vogue. She shot her.” It’s important to note that while Daniels has indeed worked in adult films, there is no credible evidence to substantiate the First Lady’s specific claim that she is a “hooker.” According to Winston Wolkoff, Melania’s astonishment stemmed from a profound sense of irony and perceived injustice. Having graced the cover of Vogue herself in 2005 in her wedding gown, she had, rather conspicuously, not been offered another cover feature since assuming the prominent role of First Lady. Daniels, by contrast, appeared in an interview feature alongside her lawyer, Michael Avenatti, in the August 2018 issue ofVogue, a fact that seemingly fueled Melania’s vexation and sense of being overlooked by the fashion establishment, highlighting a perceived double standard.

This striking revelation, captured on tape, unfolded approximately six months after bombshell news reports first surfaced about Daniels. These reports detailed a non-disclosure agreement (NDA) she had signed just weeks before the pivotal 2016 United States presidential election. The NDA was intended to silence Daniels regarding an alleged affair she had with Donald Trump in 2006, notably occurring shortly after the birth of his youngest son, Barron Trump, with Melania. Daniels reportedly received $130,000 for her silence, a payment facilitated by Trump’s then-personal lawyer, Michael Cohen. Cohen subsequently pleaded guilty in December 2018 to charges of tax evasion and campaign finance violations, later serving a three-year sentence in home confinement for his crimes, becoming a key figure in the legal fallout surrounding the Trump presidency. Winston Wolkoff’s bestselling book, Melania and Me, is replete with intimate and often explosive revelations about her close friendship with the First Lady. The newly released tape was prominently featured on the October 5 episode of Cohen’s podcast, Mea Culpa, produced by Audio Up Media and MeidasTouch. The podcast served as the initial platform for this shocking audio, amplifying its reach and impact across the political and social landscape, further fueling public debate.

The episode of Mea Culpa featuring Winston Wolkoff was recorded prior to the President and First Lady receiving their COVID-19 diagnoses, offering a pre-pandemic perspective on these revelations. During the podcast, Winston Wolkoff delved into new, deeply personal insights regarding her friendship with Melania Trump. HollywoodLife secured exclusive interviews with both Winston Wolkoff and Michael Cohen before the Mea Culpa episode aired, highlighting the intriguing parallels in their experiences. Both individuals, in their separate capacities, served as crucial insiders within the Trump orbit, albeit on different sides of the marital dynamic. Cohen aptly described their interconnected roles, stating that Winston Wolkoff is the “yin to my yang.” He elaborated on the necessity of hearing both their perspectives to truly grasp the complex and often “evil” dynamics at play within the White House during the Trump administration. Cohen, who also recently released his own revealing tell-all memoir, Disloyal: A Memoir: The True Story of the Former Personal Attorney to President Donald J. Trump, emphasized that understanding the intimate details shared by both him and Winston Wolkoff is essential for a complete picture of power, loyalty, and betrayal within the Trump world.

Michael Cohen further reflected on the profound insights he gained from Winston Wolkoff’s book, specifically praising “her interpretation and characterization of Melania.” He admitted that his own numerous interactions with Melania were “very different,” suggesting that Winston Wolkoff’s perspective offered a unique and perhaps more candid view of the First Lady’s true nature. Cohen highlighted a particularly poignant moment during his podcast interview with Stephanie, referring to the “very last question” he posed. He asked, “‘After they raided my home, my hotel room, my law office, and my safety deposit box, did [Melania] make any statements about me to you in regard to the raid and what was going on in my life?'” The answer, Cohen shared, was “upsetting,” underscoring his deep disappointment and feelings of abandonment by the Trump inner circle, including Melania, during his legal ordeal. This moment on the podcast served as a powerful testament to the perceived coldness and transactional nature of relationships within the former President’s orbit, revealing the stark realities of political alliances.

Cohen continued, expressing his profound dismay at what he perceived as Melania’s complete indifference during his time of crisis. “I had spent so many years taking care of her issues, Donald’s issues, the kids’ issues, and she was just completely callous. And disinterested, identical to the way Trump behaved,” he asserted, painting a stark picture of a relationship devoid of genuine empathy or loyalty. The origins of Winston Wolkoff’s pivotal friendship with the future First Lady trace back to 2003, a significant period when Melania had just begun her relationship with Donald Trump. As detailed in Melania and Me, their bond solidified through regular monthly lunches at the exclusive Mark Hotel in Manhattan. Their relationship extended beyond casual meetings, with the Wolkoff family frequently vacationing at the lavish Mar-a-Lago estate, a testament to their deep connection. This deep-seated friendship not only endured but seemingly strengthened when the Trumps made their monumental move from New York to Washington D.C., preparing for their tenure in the White House, making Winston Wolkoff’s subsequent revelations all the more impactful and poignant given the depth of their shared history.

Before the dramatic breakdown of their relationship, Stephanie Winston Wolkoff held a significant, albeit unofficial, advisory role to the First Lady, having previously served as the esteemed director of special events at Vogue magazine. Her influence and expertise were evident in her appointment as the executive producer of Donald Trump’s presidential inauguration in January 2017, a colossal undertaking that she orchestrated with considerable skill and effort. Beyond the pageantry of the inauguration, she also played a crucial part in helping FLOTUS conceptualize and craft her signature initiative, “Be Best,” aimed at promoting children’s well-being and responsible online behavior. However, this close working relationship and profound friendship irrevocably ended in February 2018. The rupture occurred in the wake of a highly publicized New York Timesreport, which alleged that the Trump inaugural committee had paid Winston Wolkoff an exorbitant sum of $26 million. This claim, which garnered widespread criticism and controversy, is one that Winston Wolkoff has consistently and vehemently denied, asserting it as a gross misrepresentation designed to discredit her and undermine her reputation.

In an exclusive statement provided to HollywoodLife, Stephanie Winston Wolkoff elucidated her compelling reasons for making the decision to release these sensitive tapes to the public. She explained, “When I wrote Melania and Me I knew that every word of it would be subject to potential scrutiny, so I made sure everything in the book was not only accurate, but fully provable.” This meticulous approach to her memoir underscored her commitment to truthfulness and her foresight regarding potential challenges to her narrative. Her primary motivation for the tape release was to counter persistent attacks on her credibility, stating, “I will not sit back and allow the First Lady’s chief of staff, Stephanie Grisham, continue claiming I am [dishonest] to discredit the veracity of Melania and Me.” Winston Wolkoff asserted that the White House’s ongoing campaign of “false claims about my character and integrity” compelled her to take “all appropriate steps to defend my name,” with the release of the tapes being a drastic but necessary measure to unequivocally prove her narrative and protect her reputation against what she perceived as a concerted smear campaign from the highest office.

Adding to the contentious narrative, Stephanie Grisham, then the First Lady’s chief of staff, issued a pointed statement to HollywoodLife in September, following the publication of Melania and Me. Grisham’s statement sharply criticized Winston Wolkoff’s book, dismissing it as “not only wildly self-aggrandizing, it’s just not truthful.” She further characterized the memoir as “an exercise in bizarre twisting of the truth and misguided blame for the sake of self-pity,” directly challenging the book’s integrity and its author’s motives. Grisham concluded by expressing concern that Winston Wolkoff had “overstated their friendship and her very brief role in the White House to this degree,” implying that the author had exaggerated her importance and closeness to Melania Trump for personal gain and attention. These public denunciations from the White House undoubtedly intensified the conflict and reinforced Winston Wolkoff’s conviction that the tapes were essential to validate her account against official counter-narratives and defend her integrity in the public eye.

Winston Wolkoff unequivocally stated that she taped her private conversations with Melania Trump primarily for her “own protection and proof of innocence.” This proactive measure was taken in anticipation of potential disputes and to safeguard her reputation against anticipated accusations. She elaborated in a detailed statement to HollywoodLife, revealing a troubling exchange: the First Lady, whom Stephanie had considered a very close and dear friend, informed her that the White House Counsel had received a tip-off about an impending investigation. This inquiry focused on the presidential inauguration committee’s substantial spending of $107 million, a figure that raised significant questions. Despite the First Lady explicitly acknowledging that “she [Stephanie] did nothing wrong,” Melania then conveyed a chilling message: Stephanie would nevertheless be made to “take the blame for others’ misdeeds, self-dealings, false allegations, and financial improprieties.” This alarming revelation solidified Winston Wolkoff’s belief that she was being set up as a scapegoat, necessitating the creation of documented evidence to defend herself against potential legal and reputational damage in a highly politicized environment.

The sense of betrayal reached its peak, according to Winston Wolkoff, when she “begged Melania to tell the truth” in the aftermath of The New York Times report detailing her alleged firing and the controversial $26 million payment claim. Instead of support or a joint defense, Melania’s response was deeply dismissive and emotionally jarring. Winston Wolkoff recounted that Melania went as far as to tell her “not to be so dramatic” about the profound devastation the public allegations would wreak upon her life and professional standing, effectively downplaying the severe impact on her friend. It was at this critical juncture that the painful truth became undeniably clear to Stephanie. She concluded in her statement to HollywoodLife that, “At that point, it was painfully clear that Melania was no longer her friend,” marking the definitive end of a long-standing and once intimate relationship, transformed by the harsh realities of Washington D.C. politics and personal survival, leaving behind a trail of broken trust.

HollywoodLife diligently reached out to the White House for an official comment regarding this contentious story and the specific claims made in the tapes and related statements. However, as of the time of publication, no response or official statement was received. This continued silence from the White House further underscores the sensitive and unresolved nature of the revelations brought forth by Stephanie Winston Wolkoff, leaving her account as the primary public narrative of these private conversations and alleged betrayals, in the absence of an official counter-statement.